In a climate where the word “AI” sparks heated debates throughout various industries, including film, David Cronenberg’s defense of “The Brutalist” is a breath of fresh air. He pointed out the hypocrisy lurking beneath the surface of this discourse, suggesting that some factions within the industry have weaponized discussions around artificial intelligence in filmmaking against certain projects, particularly the one directed by Brady Corbet. Cronenberg’s assertion draws attention to the fact that manipulation of sound and voice in film is a time-honored tradition. Indeed, the idea that cinema should recoil at the mention of AI while simultaneously embracing other technological advancements seems disingenuous at best.
Hollywood’s Hypocrisy: A Long History
The entertainment industry has previously embraced technology in ways that fundamentally alter the viewer’s experience. From digital sound engineering to CGI enhancements, filmmaking has evolved thanks to technological breakthroughs. The use of AI tools, particularly those like Respeecher, should be viewed in the same light as other innovations. Actors have had their voices modified to fit specific roles since the inception of cinema. To point fingers at AI while ignoring these longstanding practices reeks of selective outrage, revealing underlying biases that may have more to do with competition among filmmakers and less to do with artistic integrity.
An Innovative Frontier: Embracing AI, Not Condemning It
Critics may suggest that the incorporation of AI in films like “The Brutalist” diminishes the art form, but this is an outdated perspective. Dávíd Jancsó, the editor of “The Brutalist,” emphasized that these tools offer an unparalleled opportunity to improve filmmaking efficiency, particularly when dealing with challenging languages such as Hungarian. Rather than dismissing AI as a mere gimmick, the industry should engage in prudent discussions about the legitimate benefits it offers, especially concerning details that are often overlooked due to budgetary constraints.
Misunderstanding the Role of Technology
Cronenberg’s parallel to the scandal revolving around Harvey Weinstein introduces an essential discussion about the power dynamics in Hollywood. Much like then, contemporary critiques of innovative technologies often stem from unjust insecurities about competitive viability rather than substantive concerns about artistic merit. It is not the technology itself that is to blame, but rather how individuals and institutions choose to wield it. This brings to the forefront the urgent need for an ethical framework around emerging technologies in film, one that encourages creativity rather than stifling it through fear and tribalism.
The Real Obstacle: Artistic Elitism
The backlash against AI in films signals a deeper issue: a persistent elitism within the artistic community that views traditional methods as the only valid form of expression. This mentality can deter innovation and hinder progress, resulting in a stagnation reminiscent of a bygone era. As Cronenberg noted, the fear surrounding AI is unwarranted, yet it exposes a fissure in the relationship between traditional filmmaking ideals and modern advancements. Instead of fighting against these tools, the film industry should be leading conversations about how to integrate them creatively to enrich storytelling.
The conversation surrounding AI in filmmaking does not need to be a binary debate. Rather, it should open the door for nuanced discussions that recognize the intersections of technology, art, and ethics in a rapidly evolving landscape.
Leave a Reply